In the Keynesian consumption model, a reduction in disposable income is accompanied by a reduction in both consumer spending and savings. Aggregate spending in the economy decreases and leads us down the path to depression unless the government stimulates the economy with expansionary fiscal policy. Only large decreases in income are expected to cause large increases in debt load.
According to Milton Friedman’s Permanent Income Hypothesis, however, consumption will only be affected to the extent that individuals consider the reduction in incomes to be permanent. If the recession is expected to be temporary, then savings decreases dramatically (or debt increases) to maintain the level of consumption. When the economy rebounds, consumption does not rise. Instead, savings increases and debts are repaid. This is likely what is happening in Canada where we escaped most of the banking crisis. The story in the US is very different where projections suggest that the labour market may not recover for ten years.
There is also a microeconomic model that helps. Here, the basic premise is that a pizza today is worth more than a pizza in the future. For each individual, the difference between the two is known as the rate of time preference. When the interest rate is below the rate of time preference, we are better off by borrowing and consuming now. If the interest rate is higher, then we tend to save. Interest rates are at historically low levels and so we would expect individuals with stable incomes to be borrowing now and repaying later.
Articles:
Bank of Canada comment in Financial Post
Bloomberg report on Canadian debt relative to US debt
Ottawa Business Journal reporting on comments by the Superintendent of Bankruptcy
Is this the reason why PIMCO decreases its US government bond holding from 30% to 22%?
ReplyDelete